Alan Stewart: UK steel strategy and what it means for Scotland

Alan Stewart: UK steel strategy and what it means for Scotland

Alan Stewart

Alan Stewart examines the UK government’s push for greater domestic steel use, arguing that while well-intentioned, the policy risks raising costs and constraining investment in steel-dependent sectors – particularly in Scotland.

The UK government’s ambition to increase domestic steel usage is understandable, particularly in the context of supply chain resilience and supporting UK industry.

However, from a Scottish perspective, the implications are more complex. Scotland is not a major steel producer but is a significant user of steel across energy, defence, infrastructure and construction. As a result, any tightening of import quotas or increase in tariffs is likely to feed directly into project costs.



A 50% tariff on steel imported above quota levels represents a material cost pressure at a time when many capital-intensive projects are already being carefully managed. There is a risk that additional cost burdens will not be absorbed within supply chains but passed through to developers, contractors and ultimately end users.

There is also a practical consideration around availability. Not all steel required for major projects is readily sourced within the UK in the volumes or specifications needed. In those cases, imported steel is not a choice, but a requirement. That creates a tension between policy ambition and commercial reality.

There is also a broader question around consistency of approach.

The measures announced for the steel sector represent a clear and direct form of support for domestic production. Equally, it raises questions in the context of other strategically important sectors, such as domestic energy production, which are operating under more constrained conditions and facing the prospect of rising costs that may impact investment decisions.



For Scotland in particular, where significant investment is planned across energy and infrastructure, the key question is how these measures interact with project viability. Higher input costs, combined with existing pressures around labour, financing and delivery timelines, could influence the pace and scale of development.

The focus, therefore, should not only be on increasing domestic production, but on ensuring that policy changes do not inadvertently constrain sectors that rely on steel as a critical input.

Alan Stewart is tax partner at MHA Aberdeen

Join over 11,100 construction industry professionals in receiving our FREE daily email newsletter
Share icon
Share this article: