Appeal lodged for North Kelvinside mews homes after plans rejected

Appeal lodged for North Kelvinside mews homes after plans rejected

Park Living (Residential) Ltd has submitted an appeal after Glasgow City Council refused permission for new homes to be built on a North Kelvinside mews development.

The developer applied to construct four homes on land located at 157 Queen Margaret Drive, accessed through a pend.

Glasgow City Council officials refused consent for a number of reasons, however, Park Living is hoping councillors on Glasgow’s local review board will overturn the verdict.

Four mews homes were proposed, two with two bedrooms and two with one bedroom. Light industrial buildings on the site, that may originally have been stables, would have been cleared under the plans, reGlasgow reports.

A statement included with the appeal states: “The scheme will provide a residential development of exceptional quality offering very high standards of living in a highly sustainable location.

“These qualities were recognised by the Dundee Institute of Architects (Atelier-M Architects based in Dundee) in November 2022 when the proposals were awarded the best ‘On The Drawing Board Award’ at their annual awards ceremony.

“It is regretful and very surprising that the planning department have not viewed them in the same light. The first reason for refusal claimed that ‘the siting, form, proportions and massing’…would result in an overdevelopment of the plot.’

“This reason…is grounded in the erroneous claims that the application site lies next to a lane. The site, which comprises a former industrial premises and its associated yard, should not by any reasonable stretch of the imagination, be considered to accommodate a lane.”

Park Living has highlighted that the footprint of the proposed building is only nine square metres more than the existing premises and that the density is within the acceptable range for an inner urban area.

Addressing a further planning department concern, the planning statement reads that the one unit which is single aspect benefits from natural lighting in all rooms and from roof lights.

It is further argued that issues regarding privacy, lack of amenity space and negative impact on sunlight at neighbouring properties were not serious enough to warrant refusal.

Share icon
Share this article: